Sticks and stones may break his bones, but calling Bush a liar, WHEN THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE THAT HE WAS LYING, is a slick disinfo trick. It's a way of "gatekeeping"; IOW saying, "Nothing to see here, Citizen. Just Bush lying again. Move along!"
To anyone who can demonstrate that Bush was lying -- or even just mistaken -- I have offered $500: http://911blimp.net/$500reward.shtml This offer has been standing for more than a year already, with only a few crackpot claims but nothing approaching a serious attempt to substantiate the Bush-neck-saving propaganda found on that wrh.com web page.
Telling lies about Bush's self-implicating 9/11 witness statements is one of the recognized disinfo campaigns being carried out by the government's flase-flag fake-opposition 9/11 "truth" 'movement'.
In fact, if your U.S. Congressional candidate will not (at least pledge to) question Bush about his incriminating 9/11 witness statements, you should think at least twice about voting for that intellecutally incurious individual.
(BTW, when I explained to the wrh.com webmaster why it's so wrong to falsely dismiss Bush's statements as lies, his reply was that I must just love Bush. That's a big reason why I, hardly a Bush-lover, think that wrh.com's Mike Rivero is a real live government disinfo agent.)
1 Comments:
Sticks and stones may break his bones, but calling Bush a liar, WHEN THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE THAT HE WAS LYING, is a slick disinfo trick. It's a way of "gatekeeping"; IOW saying, "Nothing to see here, Citizen. Just Bush lying again. Move along!"
To anyone who can demonstrate that Bush was lying -- or even just mistaken -- I have offered $500: http://911blimp.net/$500reward.shtml This offer has been standing for more than a year already, with only a few crackpot claims but nothing approaching a serious attempt to substantiate the Bush-neck-saving propaganda found on that wrh.com web page.
Given how Bush's statements implicate Bush as having been in the loop, via video, on the very beginning of the supposedly-secret (supposedly-terrorist) 9/11 attacks (who had a video camera and communications network in place, waiting for the 'secret' attack to commence so that Bush could watch it happen?), all honest, democracy-loving Americans should demand that Bush's statements be questioned and investigated, not lied about and disparaged/disregarded/dismissed.
Telling lies about Bush's self-implicating 9/11 witness statements is one of the recognized disinfo campaigns being carried out by the government's flase-flag fake-opposition 9/11 "truth" 'movement'.
In fact, if your U.S. Congressional candidate will not (at least pledge to) question Bush about his incriminating 9/11 witness statements, you should think at least twice about voting for that intellecutally incurious individual.
(BTW, when I explained to the wrh.com webmaster why it's so wrong to falsely dismiss Bush's statements as lies, his reply was that I must just love Bush. That's a big reason why I, hardly a Bush-lover, think that wrh.com's Mike Rivero is a real live government disinfo agent.)
Post a Comment
<< Home